<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Fieldwork — Recently Reviewed Tools</title>
  <subtitle>Independent journalism-tool reviews from Fieldwork. Updated as evaluations land.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" href="https://fieldwork.news/feed.xml" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools" type="text/html"/>
  <id>https://fieldwork.news/feed.xml</id>
  <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Mike Schneider</name>
    <email>mike@makeitresonate.com</email>
    <uri>https://linkedin.com/in/mjschneid</uri>
  </author>
  <rights>CC BY 4.0 — https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</rights>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/clooney-trialwatch</id>
    <title>TrialWatch — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/clooney-trialwatch"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/clooney-trialwatch.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>TrialWatch has secured releases and reduced charges for journalists in Morocco, Nigeria, and Peru — this is real legal firepower backed by the Clooney Foundation, not a helpline.</summary>
    <content type="text">TrialWatch: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/journalist-assistance-network</id>
    <title>US Journalist Assistance Network — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/journalist-assistance-network"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/journalist-assistance-network.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>Five major press freedom organizations pooled their resources into a single intake point — CPJ, FPF, IWMF, PEN America, and RCFP — so journalists don&apos;t have to figure out which org to call first.</summary>
    <content type="text">US Journalist Assistance Network: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/media-defence</id>
    <title>Media Defence — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/media-defence"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/media-defence.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>Media Defence provides actual lawyers, not just advice — they fund and coordinate legal representation in cases that set precedent for press freedom globally.</summary>
    <content type="text">Media Defence: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/projourn-legal</id>
    <title>ProJourn Legal Help — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/projourn-legal"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/projourn-legal.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>ProJourn is a matchmaking service between journalists and volunteer attorneys — run by RCFP, which means the lawyer network is credible and media-law fluent.</summary>
    <content type="text">ProJourn Legal Help: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/rcfp-legal-hotline</id>
    <title>RCFP Legal Defense Hotline — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/rcfp-legal-hotline"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/rcfp-legal-hotline.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>The RCFP hotline is the first call most US journalists should make when they hit a legal wall — staffed by attorneys who specialize in media law and respond fast.</summary>
    <content type="text">RCFP Legal Defense Hotline: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/spj-legal-defense</id>
    <title>SPJ Legal Defense Fund — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/spj-legal-defense"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/spj-legal-defense.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>SPJ&apos;s Legal Defense Fund provides actual money for legal fees — not just advice or referrals — which fills a gap most other press freedom orgs don&apos;t cover.</summary>
    <content type="text">SPJ Legal Defense Fund: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/substack-defender</id>
    <title>Substack Defender — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/substack-defender"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/substack-defender.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>Substack Defender offers real legal muscle — up to $1M in coverage, partnered with FIRE — but it&apos;s locked to the Substack platform and US jurisdiction only.</summary>
    <content type="text">Substack Defender: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/trustlaw</id>
    <title>TrustLaw — unrated</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/trustlaw"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/trustlaw.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-12T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="legal"/>
    <summary>TrustLaw connects nonprofit newsrooms to a massive network of pro bono lawyers across 170 countries — the scale of the network is the differentiator.</summary>
    <content type="text">TrustLaw: unrated. </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/apify</id>
    <title>Apify — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/apify"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/apify.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="data"/>
    <summary>Apify is the developer-friendly scraping platform. Where Octoparse and ParseHub are visual point-and-click tools, Apify gives you a full platform: pre-built scrapers for 20,000+ sites, a code editor for custom scrapers (JavaScript/Python), </summary>
    <content type="text">Apify: adequate. SOC 2 Type II certified, GDPR and CCPA compliant, headquartered in the EU (Czech Republic). Stronger compliance posture than most scraping tools. Scraped data passes through their cloud infrastructure, but the EU jurisdiction and SOC 2 certification provide meaningful assurance. The open-source SDK lets you run scrapers locally for sensitive work. Adequate for most journalism scraping; use local tools for the most sensitive investigations.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/arc-search</id>
    <title>Arc Search — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/arc-search"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/arc-search.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>Arc Search is a stripped-down, AI-first mobile browser built by The Browser Company. Its headline feature, &apos;Browse for Me,&apos; takes a query, reads multiple web pages simultaneously, and generates a synthesized summary with citations — effecti</summary>
    <content type="text">Arc Search: adequate. Standard browser security practices: TLS in transit, Firebase encryption at rest, no advertising or data sales. The privacy posture is better than Chrome (no ad-tracking business model) but weaker than Firefox or Brave (not open source, AI queries are processed server-side). The Atlassian acquisition introduces governance uncertainty — Atlassian&apos;s enterprise data practices may eventually supersede The Browser Company&apos;s original privacy commitments. Rating is &apos;adequate&apos; because the tool works as claimed and handles data responsibly today, but the maintenance-mode status and ownership change warrant monitoring.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/arc-xp</id>
    <title>Arc XP — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/arc-xp"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/arc-xp.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="publishing"/>
    <summary>Arc XP is the CMS The Washington Post built for itself and then commercialized. It now powers The Boston Globe, Reuters, The Dallas Morning News, The Globe and Mail, Chicago Tribune, and hundreds of other publications worldwide. The platfor</summary>
    <content type="text">Arc XP: adequate. Enterprise-grade infrastructure on AWS with SOC 2 Type II certification, encryption in transit and at rest, and dedicated security teams. The platform is well-maintained and battle-tested at Washington Post scale. Rating is &apos;adequate&apos; rather than &apos;strong&apos; because it is closed-source, US-jurisdiction-only by default, and your content and audience data are controlled by a third party. No self-hosting option means no path to full data sovereignty.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/audiopen</id>
    <title>AudioPen — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/audiopen"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/audiopen.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="writing"/>
    <summary>AudioPen does one thing and does it well: you talk, it gives you clean text. Not a transcript — a restructured, polished version of what you said. Speak for 5 minutes in a rambling, disorganized way about what you observed at a city council</summary>
    <content type="text">AudioPen: adequate. Voice notes auto-deleted after processing. Encrypted at rest. Not used for AI training. No data sharing with third parties. Bootstrapped with no VC data monetization pressure. However, audio is still uploaded to cloud for processing, company jurisdiction is unclear, and no formal security certifications are published. Adequate for general note-taking but not for sensitive source material.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/auphonic</id>
    <title>Auphonic — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/auphonic"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/auphonic.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="visuals"/>
    <summary>Auphonic solves a real problem for journalists who produce audio: getting from raw recording to broadcast-ready without spending hours in a DAW. Upload your file, set a loudness target, and it handles leveling between speakers, noise/reverb</summary>
    <content type="text">Auphonic: adequate. Austrian/EU company subject to GDPR. Two-factor authentication available. Over a decade of stable operation. However, audio is uploaded to cloud servers for processing, specific data retention policies are not prominently documented, and encryption-at-rest status is unclear. Adequate for routine production audio but not recommended for sensitive source material.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/baserow</id>
    <title>Baserow — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/baserow"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/baserow.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="data"/>
    <summary>Baserow is what Airtable would look like if it were open source and self-hostable. Founded in Amsterdam, it offers a spreadsheet-style interface backed by a real relational database (PostgreSQL). The MIT-licensed community edition is genuin</summary>
    <content type="text">Baserow: strong. MIT-licensed, self-hostable, EU-based company. Self-hosted Baserow keeps all data on your own PostgreSQL database with no third-party access. Cloud version is GDPR-compliant on EU infrastructure. The self-hosting option with full data control is what earns &apos;strong&apos; — cloud-only use would rate &apos;adequate.&apos; For journalism, the ability to run an Airtable-equivalent on your own server with no record limits is a genuine security and cost advantage.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/bellingcat-auto-archiver</id>
    <title>Bellingcat Auto Archiver — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/bellingcat-auto-archiver"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/bellingcat-auto-archiver.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>Auto Archiver solves a real problem: social media posts get deleted, edited, or made private — often right when they become newsworthy. Bellingcat built this Python tool to automatically capture and preserve web content in a verifiable way.</summary>
    <content type="text">Bellingcat Auto Archiver: adequate. Open-source (MIT license) with active development and community review. Self-hosted architecture means you control your data — nothing is sent to Bellingcat. Security posture depends entirely on your deployment: encrypted storage, VPN usage, and access controls are your responsibility. The tool itself is well-maintained (1,500+ commits, regular releases) with no known vulnerabilities in the codebase. The main risk is operational — archiving content from adversarial actors can expose your infrastructure if not properly isolated. Adequate for journalism use with appropriate deployment practices.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/blacklight</id>
    <title>Blacklight — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/blacklight"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/blacklight.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="security"/>
    <summary>Blacklight is investigative journalism as a tool. The Markup built it to make the invisible surveillance infrastructure of the web visible to anyone — no technical expertise required. Enter a URL, wait 30-60 seconds, and Blacklight scans th</summary>
    <content type="text">Blacklight: strong. Blacklight is not a tool that handles your data — it is a tool that reveals how other sites handle visitor data. The &apos;strong&apos; rating reflects The Markup&apos;s credibility (Pulitzer-finalist nonprofit newsroom), the tool&apos;s transparency (Blacklight Query is open source), the absence of tracking on the tool itself, and the public-interest mission behind it. There is no meaningful security risk in using Blacklight: you enter a URL, it scans the site, you read the results. No account, no personal data, no tracking. The only consideration is that The Markup&apos;s servers process the URLs you scan — if your scan targets reveal your investigative interests, that is a minor operational security consideration, though The Markup has no incentive or history of disclosing such information.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/capcut</id>
    <title>CapCut — caution</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/capcut"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/capcut.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="visuals"/>
    <summary>CapCut is a video editor built by ByteDance, the Beijing-headquartered company that owns TikTok. It launched in 2020 and crossed 200 million monthly active users by 2023. The editor is genuinely good: timeline editing, keyframing, motion tr</summary>
    <content type="text">CapCut: caution. The &apos;caution&apos; rating reflects ByteDance&apos;s data governance structure: Chinese national security law applies to the parent company, the ToS grant a perpetual license to all uploaded content, a biometric data class-action is pending, and the legal framework for a US ban remains in place. CapCut has not published SOC 2, ISO 27001, or equivalent security certifications. For public social video with no sensitive content, the risk is manageable. For any journalistic material involving sources, unpublished work, or operational security, CapCut is inappropriate.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/carto</id>
    <title>CARTO — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/carto"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/carto.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="data"/>
    <summary>CARTO (originally CartoDB) is the enterprise end of the journalism mapping spectrum. Where Felt is Google Docs for maps and Datawrapper handles quick chart-to-map conversions, CARTO handles the hard stuff: analyzing millions of spatial data</summary>
    <content type="text">CARTO: strong. CARTO&apos;s cloud-native architecture is a genuine security advantage — your spatial data stays in your own data warehouse and CARTO queries it in place, rather than copying it to their servers. Encryption in transit and at rest. GDPR compliant. Well-funded company with enterprise security posture. The &apos;data never leaves your cloud&apos; model makes this one of the more privacy-friendly options for large-scale geospatial analysis. Appropriate for sensitive data journalism if your underlying data infrastructure is properly secured.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/changedetection</id>
    <title>ChangeDetection.io — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/changedetection"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/changedetection.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>ChangeDetection.io solves a specific, high-value journalism problem: knowing when a web page changes before anyone else notices. Government agencies quietly edit policy pages. Companies update terms of service. Court dockets add new filings</summary>
    <content type="text">ChangeDetection.io: strong. Open-source (MIT license), fully auditable code, self-hostable with zero third-party data exposure. When self-hosted, this is one of the strongest privacy stories in the journalism tool landscape — no one else knows what you&apos;re watching, when pages changed, or what the changes were. The code is actively maintained with regular releases. For the hosted SaaS version, the rating drops to &apos;adequate&apos; since the service necessarily knows your monitoring targets. Self-hosted deployment is the recommended approach for any sensitive monitoring work.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/clinicaltrials-gov</id>
    <title>ClinicalTrials.gov — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/clinicaltrials-gov"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/clinicaltrials-gov.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>ClinicalTrials.gov is the public ledger of medical research. When a pharmaceutical company announces a promising drug, the trial should be registered here — with its protocol, endpoints, enrollment targets, and (eventually) results. When th</summary>
    <content type="text">ClinicalTrials.gov: strong. US government service operated by NIH/NLM with no advertising, no data sales, and no third-party tracking. No account required for searching. All data is public record. Minimal data collection. The &apos;strong&apos; rating reflects institutional credibility, federal security standards, absence of commercial incentives, and the fact that using this service exposes no meaningful personal data.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/consensus</id>
    <title>Consensus — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/consensus"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/consensus.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <summary>Consensus and Elicit occupy similar territory — AI-powered academic search — but take different approaches. Elicit is the researcher&apos;s tool: deep extraction, data tables, systematic review support. Consensus is the reporter&apos;s tool: ask a pl</summary>
    <content type="text">Consensus: adequate. HTTPS encryption in transit. U.S. jurisdiction. VC-backed startup with standard security practices. No published SOC 2 certification or independent security audit. Search queries reveal your research interests, which is the primary privacy consideration for journalists. Adequate for academic background research and fact-checking. Be mindful that query patterns could reveal story angles for sensitive investigations.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/copyscape</id>
    <title>Copyscape — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/copyscape"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/copyscape.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="verification"/>
    <summary>Copyscape has been the default plagiarism checker since 2004 and it still works well for its core job: finding duplicate content on the open web. The pay-per-search model is honest — you spend 3-5 cents per check instead of committing to a </summary>
    <content type="text">Copyscape: adequate. Long-established service (2004) with a simple, stable business model and no known breaches. Encryption in transit confirmed. The main consideration is that submitted text is transmitted to their servers for processing — don&apos;t submit sensitive unpublished investigative material. For its intended use case (checking if text appeared elsewhere on the web), the privacy risk is minimal. Bootstrapped company with 20-year track record — no investor pressure to monetize user data.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/corporate-prosecution-registry</id>
    <title>Corporate Prosecution Registry — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/corporate-prosecution-registry"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/corporate-prosecution-registry.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>The Corporate Prosecution Registry is the only comprehensive public database of federal corporate criminal prosecutions in the United States. It contains every case since 1990 where the Department of Justice charged a business entity (not j</summary>
    <content type="text">Corporate Prosecution Registry: strong. Hosted by a major US public university with institutional IT infrastructure and security. No user accounts, no personal data collection, no login required. The data is entirely public federal court records with zero sensitivity. No advertising, no tracking beyond standard university analytics. The threat model is essentially zero — you are searching public court records on a university website. No record of security incidents. Rating reflects the combination of zero-sensitivity public data, no authentication requirements, and institutional hosting.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/darktable</id>
    <title>darktable — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/darktable"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/darktable.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="visuals"/>
    <summary>darktable 5.4.1 (February 2026) is a genuinely capable Lightroom alternative. Non-destructive editing, GPU-accelerated processing via OpenCL, and a database-driven lighttable for managing thousands of images. The tone mapping options — Film</summary>
    <content type="text">darktable: strong. Fully local, open-source under GPL-3.0, no accounts or telemetry. All processing happens on your machine with no network connections. Original files are never modified. Granular metadata export controls support source protection workflows. One of the strongest privacy stories in photo software.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/data-gov</id>
    <title>Data.gov — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/data-gov"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/data-gov.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="data"/>
    <summary>Data.gov is the federal government&apos;s central catalog for open data — over 370,000 datasets from dozens of agencies, required by statute under the OPEN Government Data Act. It is a catalog, not a database. Data.gov indexes metadata and links</summary>
    <content type="text">Data.gov: strong. Federal government website operated by GSA on government infrastructure. HTTPS throughout. Subject to federal cybersecurity standards. No account required for core functionality. No commercial tracking. The datasets themselves are public records. The only consideration is data provenance — always verify that a dataset is current and sourced from the authoritative agency, since Data.gov is a catalog pointing to external agency servers.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/deepseek</id>
    <title>DeepSeek — caution</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/deepseek"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/deepseek.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <summary>DeepSeek is the most controversial entry in this directory, and the nuance matters. There are two entirely different products here: the web chat interface (chat.deepseek.com), and the open-weight models you can download and run locally. The</summary>
    <content type="text">DeepSeek: caution. This rating applies to the web interface (chat.deepseek.com). Chinese data jurisdiction with mandatory intelligence cooperation laws, no independent judicial oversight, banned by multiple governments, and subject to ongoing EU regulatory action. For journalists, using the web interface with any sensitive material is inadvisable. However: the open-weight models (DeepSeek-R1, V3) run locally with zero data exposure and would rate &apos;strong&apos; on privacy — the math doesn&apos;t phone home. The rating reflects the product most users will encounter (the web interface), not the self-hosted deployment that technical users can configure.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/disconnect</id>
    <title>Disconnect — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/disconnect"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/disconnect.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="security"/>
    <summary>Disconnect is the quiet backbone of browser privacy. Its tracker protection list powers Firefox&apos;s Enhanced Tracking Protection, Microsoft Edge&apos;s tracking prevention, and Samsung Internet&apos;s Smart Anti-Tracking. The standalone extension block</summary>
    <content type="text">Disconnect: adequate. Open source (GPL v3), runs entirely locally in the browser, collects no user data. The tracker protection technology is trusted enough that Mozilla, Microsoft, and Samsung license it for their browsers — that is a meaningful signal. Rating is &apos;adequate&apos; rather than &apos;strong&apos; because the extension&apos;s development has slowed, the curated list approach has inherent lag against new trackers, and the company&apos;s focus has shifted toward enterprise products. The tool does what it claims, but journalists needing maximum protection should pair it with uBlock Origin and other layered defenses.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/elicit</id>
    <title>Elicit — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/elicit"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/elicit.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="ai"/>
    <summary>Elicit is the best AI tool for finding and synthesizing academic research. Not the fastest, not the cheapest — the most trustworthy. Every claim it generates links to the exact sentence in the source paper. That traceability is the entire v</summary>
    <content type="text">Elicit: adequate. Public benefit corporation structure provides some alignment of incentives. HTTPS encryption in transit. U.S. jurisdiction. Research queries reveal your investigative interests, which is the primary privacy consideration. No published SOC 2 certification or independent security audit. Adequate for academic background research. Be mindful that query patterns could reveal unpublished story angles for sensitive investigations.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/expertise-finder</id>
    <title>Expertise Finder — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/expertise-finder"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/expertise-finder.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>Expertise Finder is a searchable directory of university faculty across North America, built specifically to connect journalists with academic experts. Co-founded in 2011 by Stavros Rougas (a former CBC Radio journalist who got frustrated f</summary>
    <content type="text">Expertise Finder: adequate. Low-risk tool for journalists — no account required for searching, minimal personal data collection. Faculty data is published with institutional consent. Canadian jurisdiction with standard privacy protections. The main concern is not security but completeness: results are limited to paying institutions, which could bias your sourcing if you rely on it exclusively. Adequate for its purpose as a sourcing aid.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/factiverse</id>
    <title>Factiverse — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/factiverse"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/factiverse.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="verification"/>
    <summary>Factiverse is one of the few AI fact-checking tools actually built for newsrooms rather than retrofitted from a content marketing product. Founded in Norway in 2019, it&apos;s been used by NRK (Norway&apos;s state broadcaster) for election coverage a</summary>
    <content type="text">Factiverse: adequate. Norwegian company under GDPR jurisdiction — strong legal framework for data protection. Encryption in transit confirmed. Specific data retention and at-rest encryption details not publicly documented, which is typical for enterprise-only products. No known breaches or privacy incidents. The Norwegian jurisdiction and journalism-specific focus are positive signals, but the lack of public security documentation means you should verify terms contractually before submitting sensitive editorial content.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/fathom</id>
    <title>Fathom — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/fathom"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/fathom.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="writing"/>
    <summary>Fathom&apos;s free tier is unusually generous — unlimited recordings, unlimited storage, transcription, and AI summaries at no cost. That alone makes it worth evaluating. The tool records both audio and video during Zoom, Google Meet, and Micros</summary>
    <content type="text">Fathom: adequate. Strong compliance posture: HIPAA, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, and Zoom-security-reviewed. Encryption in transit and at rest, no third-party cookies, no AI training on user data. Recordings are private by default. The main risk is inherent to the category — all recordings are cloud-stored, and a visible bot joins every call. Appropriate for on-the-record interviews and editorial meetings. Not appropriate for sensitive source conversations.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/felt</id>
    <title>Felt — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/felt"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/felt.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="data"/>
    <summary>Felt is the closest thing to Google Docs for maps. You open a browser, upload data or draw on the map, and share a link. That simplicity is the product. Traditional GIS tools like QGIS and ArcGIS are powerful but require installation, train</summary>
    <content type="text">Felt: strong. SOC 2 Type II certified and GDPR compliant — unusual for a mapping tool at this stage. Encryption in transit and at rest. U.S. jurisdiction with AWS hosting. MFA required for employee access to internal systems. The cloud-only model means your data lives on their servers, but the security posture is genuinely strong for a Series A company. Appropriate for public data journalism. Use local GIS tools for investigations involving sensitive geographic intelligence.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/foia-gov</id>
    <title>FOIA.gov — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/foia-gov"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/foia-gov.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>FOIA.gov is the Department of Justice&apos;s centralized portal for the Freedom of Information Act. It lets you submit requests to over 100 federal agencies from a single interface, search agency FOIA libraries for previously released records, a</summary>
    <content type="text">FOIA.gov: strong. Federal government website operated by the Department of Justice on government infrastructure. HTTPS throughout. Subject to federal cybersecurity standards (FISMA, FedRAMP). No commercial tracking or advertising. The main consideration is not technical security but operational privacy: your FOIA requests are federal records that may be publicly logged, which can reveal your reporting interests to the agency you are investigating and to anyone who reviews FOIA logs.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/gamma</id>
    <title>Gamma — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/gamma"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/gamma.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="writing"/>
    <summary>Gamma turns text prompts into polished presentations using &apos;cards&apos; — responsive content blocks that break from the rigid 16:9 slide format. It&apos;s genuinely fast: describe what you want, and Gamma produces a working deck in seconds. The 3.0 u</summary>
    <content type="text">Gamma: adequate. Standard cloud SaaS with encryption in transit. All content is AI-processed, meaning everything you enter flows through Gamma&apos;s models. No published SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications found. GDPR concerns around viewer tracking have been raised by enterprise users. Adequate for public-facing content, but not appropriate for sensitive or confidential material.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/geoconfirmed</id>
    <title>GeoConfirmed — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/geoconfirmed"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/geoconfirmed.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="verification"/>
    <summary>GeoConfirmed fills a specific gap in the conflict-verification ecosystem: it provides crowd-verified precise coordinates for events captured on social media video. When a video surfaces showing an airstrike, explosion, or military movement,</summary>
    <content type="text">GeoConfirmed: adequate. The platform publishes publicly available geolocation data derived from open-source social media. No accounts required to view data — minimal privacy exposure for users. The data itself is conflict documentation, not personal information. Netherlands-based operation within EU jurisdiction. The main considerations are source-media link fragility (not a security issue but an evidence-preservation issue) and the absence of formal organizational governance. Rating reflects low-risk data profile and no-login access, balanced against limited documentation of infrastructure security practices and no formal institutional backing.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/global-fishing-watch</id>
    <title>Global Fishing Watch — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/global-fishing-watch"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/global-fishing-watch.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>Global Fishing Watch is one of the most powerful open tools for ocean-related investigative journalism. It tracks the activity of more than 65,000 commercial fishing vessels globally using a combination of AIS data, Vessel Monitoring System</summary>
    <content type="text">Global Fishing Watch: strong. US-based nonprofit with a transparency mission. All data is public and open — there is no sensitive proprietary information to protect. The code is open source on GitHub, allowing full methodology verification. Infrastructure runs on Google Cloud Platform with standard enterprise security. Minimal user data collection (email for optional account). No advertising, no data sales, no commercial surveillance. The open-source, open-data architecture is the strongest possible trust signal for investigative work: every detection is reproducible and verifiable. No record of security incidents.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/global-forest-watch</id>
    <title>Global Forest Watch — strong</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/global-forest-watch"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/global-forest-watch.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>Global Forest Watch is the definitive public tool for tracking deforestation anywhere on Earth. It combines satellite imagery from Landsat, Sentinel, and other sources into a continuously updated picture of global tree cover change going ba</summary>
    <content type="text">Global Forest Watch: strong. Operated by WRI, a major global research institution with strong governance and a 40-year track record. All data is public satellite-derived information — no sensitive proprietary data to protect. Open-source code and peer-reviewed methodology provide full transparency. Infrastructure on Google Cloud with standard enterprise security. Minimal user data collection — platform works without login. The main concern is standard Google Analytics tracking search patterns, which is mitigatable by downloading datasets for offline analysis. No record of security incidents. The open, reproducible methodology is the strongest possible trust architecture for investigative environmental journalism.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/google-fact-check-explorer</id>
    <title>Google Fact Check Explorer — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/google-fact-check-explorer"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/google-fact-check-explorer.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="verification"/>
    <summary>Fact Check Explorer is a search engine that indexes fact-checks published by organizations worldwide using ClaimReview structured data markup. Type a claim or keyword, get back fact-checks from hundreds of publishers with their verdicts — f</summary>
    <content type="text">Google Fact Check Explorer: adequate. Standard Google service with HTTPS and enterprise-grade infrastructure. The privacy trade-off is typical of Google products: your search queries are logged and subject to Google&apos;s broad data collection practices. For routine verification work this is fine. For sensitive pre-publication research, the fact that Google can see exactly what claims you&apos;re investigating warrants caution — use without signing in and consider your threat model.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/guidestar</id>
    <title>GuideStar (Candid) — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/guidestar"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/guidestar.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="newsgathering"/>
    <summary>GuideStar is the standard tool for researching US nonprofits. It profiles 1.9 million IRS-recognized tax-exempt organizations with data pulled from 990 filings, direct nonprofit reporting, and Candid&apos;s own research. The merger with Foundati</summary>
    <content type="text">GuideStar (Candid): adequate. Operated by a well-established nonprofit (Candid) with a 25+ year track record. HTTPS throughout. Account required for full access. The underlying nonprofit data is derived from public IRS filings, so the data itself is not sensitive. Your search patterns and the nonprofits you research are visible to Candid. Privacy policy is clear and recently updated. No advertising trackers. Adequate security for the nature of the data — the main consideration is operational, not technical.</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://fieldwork.news/tools/heygen</id>
    <title>HeyGen — adequate</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/heygen"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/markdown" href="https://fieldwork.news/tools/heygen.md"/>
    <updated>2026-04-11T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <author><name>Mike Schneider</name></author>
    <category term="visuals"/>
    <summary>HeyGen generates synthetic talking-head videos from text scripts using AI avatars. Founded in 2020 by Joshua Xu and Wayne Liang (Carnegie Mellon alumni), the company hit $100M revenue in October 2025 after raising $60M at a $500M valuation </summary>
    <content type="text">HeyGen: adequate. HeyGen maintains SOC 2 Type 2 certification, GDPR compliance, and a structured consent flow for biometric data. The company&apos;s trust and safety team actively moderates content. The &apos;adequate&apos; rating reflects the solid security infrastructure and privacy practices, balanced against the inherent dual-use risk of synthetic media technology and the absence of C2PA provenance on outputs. The consent mechanisms are better than most competitors, but the technology remains fundamentally capable of misuse.</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
